The smothering embrace : competition in the implementation of social policy
By: VAN DEN BRINK, Jasper C
.
Contributor(s): Brandsen, Taco | Putters, Kim.
Material type: 
ArticlePublisher: 2002Subject(s): Reforma Administrativa | Competitividade | NetherlandsSocial Policy & Administration 36, 2, p. 200-215Abstract: One element of recent welfare state reform has been the introduction of market coordination in the implementation of social policy. The authors of this article have conducted a comparative study of social security, health care and housing policy implementation in the Netherlands, focusing on the conditions necessary for an effective mechanism of competition. The most important condition is that clients should be able to switch between providers without difficulty. Evidence shows that the providers in these fields of social policy engage in activities that undermine the potential for future competition. While this is not unconmmon in itself, the new markets in social policy appear to be particularly vulnerable to such activities. This can be explained on the basis of two variable: (I) the institutional characteristics of the policy fields as they existed before the inroduction of market coordination, and (II) the characteristics of the products that providers distribute. The combination of path dependency and product charateristics strengthens efforts to reduce competition
| Item type | Current location | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Periódico | Biblioteca Graciliano Ramos | Periódico | Not for loan |
One element of recent welfare state reform has been the introduction of market coordination in the implementation of social policy. The authors of this article have conducted a comparative study of social security, health care and housing policy implementation in the Netherlands, focusing on the conditions necessary for an effective mechanism of competition. The most important condition is that clients should be able to switch between providers without difficulty. Evidence shows that the providers in these fields of social policy engage in activities that undermine the potential for future competition. While this is not unconmmon in itself, the new markets in social policy appear to be particularly vulnerable to such activities. This can be explained on the basis of two variable: (I) the institutional characteristics of the policy fields as they existed before the inroduction of market coordination, and (II) the characteristics of the products that providers distribute. The combination of path dependency and product charateristics strengthens efforts to reduce competition
Click on an image to view it in the image viewer
There are no comments for this item.